Accessing accurate chronological data regarding controversial 20th-century figures often requires a deep dive into European municipal archives and international legal repositories. When examining queries related to the Streicher lineage or identifying specific chronological milestones such as birth dates and military service durations, researchers must look beyond superficial summaries. The following analysis explores the documentation surrounding historical records typically associated with the search for Streichbruder age and Wikipedia-style data structures.

The Genesis of Archival Identification: 1885 Records

Historical documentation from the late 19th century in the Kingdom of Bavaria provides the primary basis for establishing the age of individuals born within that era. In the case of the Streicher family, specifically Julius Streicher, the archival trail begins in the village of Fleinhausen. According to primary birth registries, there are nuanced discrepancies that historical researchers often encounter.

Most high-authority databases, including centralized genealogical records, point to February 12, 1885, as the definitive date of birth. However, certain encyclopedic entries and regional school records have occasionally cited February 22, 1885. This ten-day variance is a common phenomenon in late 19th-century records, often resulting from delays in official registration or transcription errors during the transition from local parish records to state-level administrative files.

To calculate the precise age at any given historical moment, the February 12 date is generally prioritized due to its consistency across military enlistment papers and subsequent legal defense documents used in the 1940s. These records identify the individual as the ninth child of Friedrich Streicher, an elementary school teacher, and his wife Anna. The genealogical context is essential for validating the age data found in modern digital repositories.

Professional Chronology and Military Service Logs

The progression of an individual's age through the volatile early 20th century is best tracked through state-mandated employment and military logs. For those researching the timeline of this period, the transition from civilian education to active combat service provides a wealth of data points.

Records indicate that following a standard educational path, a tenure as an elementary school teacher began in Nuremberg. This career phase was interrupted by the outbreak of World War I in 1914. At this juncture, being approximately 29 years of age, the individual in question entered the German Army. Service records from 1914 to 1918 document a transition from a volunteer status to earning a battlefield commission as a lieutenant.

The documentation of this four-year military tenure is critical for age verification. For instance, the awarding of the Iron Cross 1st and 2nd class is tied to specific dates in the mid-war period, confirming the presence and active status of the individual during their early 30s. Post-war demobilization records from 1919 show a return to Nuremberg, marking the beginning of a radicalized political phase that would span the next two and a half decades.

Political Tenure and Administrative Records in Franconia

As the 1920s progressed, the administrative records of the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP) became a secondary source for age-related data. When examining the "Streichbruder" or Streicher presence in Nuremberg, the founding of specialized publications serves as a chronological marker.

The establishment of Der Stürmer in May 1923 occurred when the founder was 38 years old. This publication's history is inextricably linked to the chronological development of political propaganda in the Weimar Republic. Archival copies of the newspaper, along with contemporary police reports from Munich during the November 1923 coup attempt, place the individual at the center of documented events at the age of 38.

By 1925, following the reorganization of political structures, the appointment as Gauleiter of Franconia moved the individual into a higher tier of bureaucratic record-keeping. These records track an individual's progression from their late 30s into their early 50s. The administrative authority wielded during this time resulted in a massive volume of signed decrees, speeches, and correspondence, all of which are timestamped and serve to verify the individual’s continuous active presence in the German political landscape.

The International Military Tribunal: Legal Verification of Age

Perhaps the most authoritative source for verifying the age and vital statistics of high-ranking figures from this era is the documentation produced by the International Military Tribunal (IMT) at Nuremberg. During the 1945-1946 proceedings, the defendants were subjected to rigorous biographical screening, psychological evaluation, and medical examinations.

U.S. military records from the time of capture in May 1945 describe the individual as being 60 years of age. At this point, after fleeing and attempting to evade capture in southern Germany disguised as a painter, the physical and mental state of the individual was documented by Allied medical officers. These psychiatric reports, which included intelligence testing (scoring a 106), provide a unique snapshot of a historical figure's profile at the threshold of their final year.

The trial records themselves, which fill dozens of volumes, consistently refer to the birth date of February 12, 1885. This was used to establish the legal identity of the defendant during the reading of the indictments. The use of such data in a court of law provides a level of verification that surpasses standard journalistic or encyclopedic summaries.

Mortality Data and the Final Conclusion

The final entries in the archival record of Julius Streicher occur in October 1946. Following the sentencing by the International Military Tribunal on October 1, 1946—where a conviction for crimes against humanity was handed down—the timeline moves toward its conclusion.

The execution by hanging took place on October 16, 1946. At the moment of death, the individual was 61 years, 8 months, and 4 days old. This exact calculation is based on the verified birth date of February 12, 1885. Post-mortem records and the subsequent handling of the remains (cremation and disposal of ashes in the Wenzbach, a tributary of the Isar River) conclude the official state and international documentation of this lifespan.

For those searching for "age" data, this 61-year span represents a period of significant global upheaval. The transition from a 19th-century village upbringing to a central role in a genocidal regime, ending in an international war crimes trial, is a timeline that has been meticulously preserved for historical study.

Digital Preservation and the Role of Wikipedia/Wikidata

In the contemporary era, the way we consume historical data has shifted toward centralized digital repositories. Wikipedia and its structured data counterpart, Wikidata (entry Q76984), serve as the primary portals for the public to access these historical dates. These platforms aggregate data from the sources mentioned above—municipal records, trial transcripts, and academic biographies.

When a user queries "streichbruder age wikipedia," the search engine attempts to reconcile the colloquial or misspelled term with the structured data available. The accuracy of these digital platforms depends entirely on the rigorousness of the citations provided. In the case of the Streicher lineage, the digital record is quite robust because of the immense historical interest in the Nuremberg trials and the Holocaust.

Digital archives often list the following key milestones:

  • Birth Date: February 12, 1885
  • Place of Birth: Fleinhausen, Bavaria
  • Significant Career Start: 1923 (Founding of propaganda outlets)
  • Political Peak: 1933–1940 (Gauleiter of Franconia)
  • Death Date: October 16, 1946
  • Age at Death: 61

These platforms also categorize individuals based on their roles, such as "German publisher," "Nazi politician," and "Convicted war criminal." This categorization helps in contextualizing the age data within the broader framework of 20th-century history.

Navigating Archival Discrepancies

A critical aspect of historical research is the reconciliation of conflicting data. While the 61-year lifespan is generally accepted, a serious researcher must account for the primary source variations. For instance, why does Britannica sometimes list February 22 while the IMT lists February 12?

This discrepancy highlights the nature of historical record-keeping. Early biographers may have relied on a single local document that was incorrectly transcribed, and that error then propagated through subsequent academic works. It is only through the cross-referencing of multiple independent archives—church records, military rosters, and legal transcripts—that a definitive consensus is reached. For the individual in question, the military and trial records are generally considered more reliable due to the severe consequences of providing false identification in those contexts.

Conclusion: The Importance of Accurate Chronological Records

The study of historical age and timelines is more than a mere exercise in numbers. In the context of 20th-century history, these dates provide the structure upon which we understand the rise and fall of ideologies. The 61 years of the Streicher timeline serve as a documentation of how an individual’s life can be traced through the bureaucratic systems of a transforming nation—from the imperial era through the chaos of the Weimar Republic to the atrocities of the Third Reich and the eventual justice of the post-war world.

For researchers and students utilizing modern tools to find information on the Streicher age, the data points found on Wikipedia and in archival summaries offer a window into a dark chapter of human history. By ensuring these dates are accurate and contextualized within the official records of events like the Nuremberg trials, we maintain the integrity of the historical narrative.